Search

Transactive energy and peer-to-peer trading are key enablers of distributed energy markets. Optimization models drive these systems, but a systematic taxonomy linking models to prosumer flexibility, EV coordination, and grid constraints is lacking. This article develops a taxonomy of transactive energy and P2P trading optimization models. It classifies models according to their treatment of prosumer flexibility, EV integration, and local network constraints. A structured literature review of 27 articles published between 2017 and 2025 was conducted. Models were categorized across market, optimization, flexibility, EV, and network-integration dimensions. The taxonomy organizes models by market mechanism, optimization method, and depth of grid and flexibility integration. It reveals significant gaps in holistic multi-vector coordination. The taxonomy provides a systematic framework for comparing optimization models in local energy markets. It also identifies research needs for integrated, grid-aware, flexibility-oriented transactive systems.

Peer-to-peer solar trading can empower prosumers but poses congestion risks for distribution networks. A bilevel framework that separates market functions from network oversight can enable secure, efficient transactive energy. This article proposes a conceptual bilevel transactive energy framework that coordinates P2P solar trading, EV charging flexibility, and active congestion management. The framework is intended as an architectural contribution rather than a mathematical optimization model. The framework is designed conceptually, with an upper market layer and a lower network operation layer. Information flows, decision logics, and validation pathways are described without mathematical formulation. The framework defines clear roles for market participants and the DSO, integrates EV flexibility as a congestion-mitigation resource, and includes a feedback mechanism from network to market. Five tables summarize the architecture, component functions, and validation plan. The proposed conceptual architecture can guide future software implementations, regulatory sandbox designs, and field pilots. It bridges the gap between market innovation and grid reliability.