Institute of Smart Energy Systems Press Institute of Smart Energy Systems Press

Maximizing Renewable Energy Integration in the Egyptian Power Grid Using the Coronavirus Optimization Algorithm

Original Research | Open access | Published: 20 September 2025
Volume 4, article number 118, (2025) Cite this article
You have full access to this open access article.
Download PDF
, , ,
  1. Department of Smart Grid Technologies, Faculty of Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
  2. Department of Energy Data Analytics, Faculty of Engineering, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
107 Accesses

Abstract

Global efforts are increasingly focused on achieving fully sustainable energy systems by mid-century to comply with the Paris Agreement targets. This study introduces a novel approach for the optimal operation of the Egyptian power grid, aiming to maximize renewable energy integration while minimizing voltage fluctuations and overall power losses. The optimization is implemented using the Corona Virus Optimization (CVO) algorithm. The proposed CVO method is benchmarked against the Teaching and Learning-Based Optimization (TLBO) algorithm for voltage deviation, power losses, and renewable energy share. The study uses real-world data on electricity demand, solar irradiation, and wind speed for representative winter and summer days. A 2020 Egyptian grid model is developed, simulated, and optimized using DIgSILENT software. Results demonstrate that CVO outperforms TLBO in enabling the grid to operate with the highest achievable share of renewable energy. This research contributes toward Egypt’s national objectives of reaching 20% and 42% renewable energy penetration by 2022 and 2035, respectively.

Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles in related subjects:

Introduction

The global transition toward the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [1] has emphasized the importance of clean energy, particularly SDG 7, which targets universal access to sustainable energy. Worldwide, nations are striving to achieve fully renewable energy systems to fulfill the 2016 Paris Agreement on climate change [2]. Several countries have made remarkable progress: Iceland relies entirely on renewable power, Norway generates over 98% of its electricity from renewable sources, and Costa Rica produces more than 95% of its electricity from renewable sources [3]. In Africa, Kenya achieves a 70% share of renewable energy as its primary electricity source, while Egypt has already deployed significant renewable installations, including hydro and photovoltaic generators [4]. Egypt aims to achieve 42% renewable energy penetration by 2035 [5].

Numerous studies have explored strategies for transitioning power systems to 100% renewable energy. Reference [6] proposed methods for secondary voltage control in fully renewable grids, while [7] examined Japan’s transition to a fully sustainable power system. In Ref. [8], researchers addressed the parameter settings of power systems with high photovoltaic penetration. Policy, technical, and institutional strategies for converting conventional power systems to 100% renewable energy were analyzed in Ref. [9]. Similarly, Ref. [10] outlined a roadmap for Macedonia to achieve complete sustainability by 2050, and Ref. [11] presented techniques for operating high-renewable power systems efficiently while minimizing generator costs. Sweden plans to generate 100% clean electricity by 2040 [12], whereas Portugal’s energy system is optimized for 100% renewables by 2050 using hydropower solutions [13]. In Spain, studies [14, 15] highlighted wind turbine repowering as a means to enhance renewable energy penetration.

The role of information and communication technologies in supporting SDG 7 has also been examined [16]. Optimizing power system operations with both conventional and renewable generators has been widely applied to minimize costs and maximize renewable integration [17]. In Egypt, optimal power flow strategies have been utilized to increase renewable generation while reducing overall losses [4].

Various optimization techniques have been adopted to improve system performance. Genetic Algorithms (GA) were explored in Ref. [18], Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) in Ref. [19], and the Teaching-Learning Based Optimization (TLBO) method was first introduced by Rao in 2011 [20]. TLBO has been applied in Egypt to maximize the contribution of renewable energy and minimize losses [4]. Since 2020, the global COVID-19 pandemic has inspired the development of the Corona Virus Optimization (CVO) algorithm [21], which models viral behavior as an optimization tool for complex systems.

This paper makes the following contributions:

·   It focuses on maximizing renewable energy generation in Egypt while achieving minimal voltage deviations and total power losses.

·   It demonstrates the application of the CVO algorithm for optimal power flow in the Egyptian grid and compares the results with those from TLBO and non-optimized cases.

·   It emphasizes the operation of Upper Egypt with near-100% renewable energy supply during most daytime hours, leveraging a large photovoltaic park and two hydropower stations.

Egyptian Power System

The 2016 Egyptian grid was modeled in Ref. [22] using DIgSILENT PowerFactory, encompassing all generation units, transmission lines, transformers, reactors, and loads existing at that time. In Ref. [4], the model was updated to reflect the 2020 grid, incorporating newly commissioned plants such as the Benban photovoltaic park (planned 1.8 GW) and the expanded Gabal Zeet wind farm (0.54 GW), alongside three 4.8 GW combined-cycle power plants at Burullus, Beni Suef, and the New Capital, as depicted in Figure 1. These large-scale additions, along with upgraded transmission infrastructure, resulted in the system being partitioned into six geographic regions.

Figure 1. The Egyptian grid.

Figure 1. The Egyptian grid.

The Upper Egypt area contains three power generation facilities, all relying on renewable energy: the High Dam Power Plant with 2.1 GW capacity, the Aswan Reservoir Plant with 0.55 GW capacity, and the planned Benban Photovoltaic Park, which is expected to reach 1.8 GW. This region maintains electrical connections with both Middle Egypt and the Canal region, the latter comprising wind farms and conventional fossil-fuel-based power stations.

This study applies optimal operational strategies to the Egyptian grid to achieve maximum renewable energy integration, reduce overall power losses, and minimize voltage deviations. Additionally, the research evaluates the number of hours during which the Upper Egypt region could rely entirely on renewable energy without drawing power from fossil-fuel sources in the Middle Egypt region.

All simulations and optimization processes are executed using DIgSILENT PowerFactory due to its versatile capabilities for large-scale grid studies, including the ability to:

•    Conduct power flow analyses

•    Solve optimal power flow problems

•    Perform short-circuit evaluations

•    Analyze contingencies

•    Execute transient stability simulations [22]

Renewable Energy in Egypt

Currently, Egypt uses three main renewable energy technologies: solar photovoltaics, hydropower plants, and wind energy.

Solar photovoltaics

Egypt enjoys abundant solar resources throughout the year, with daily average radiation levels ranging from 5 to 8 kWh/m² [23], and Aswan alone exhibits an average solar intensity of 0.367 kW/m² [24]. In line with the 2035 Sustainable Development Strategy, a decision was made in September 2014 to construct a large-scale photovoltaic park in Aswan [25].

Upon completion, the Benban Photovoltaic Park is expected to have an installed capacity of 1800 MW, making it among the largest PV parks in the world without storage systems. The facility is situated about 40 km northwest of Aswan in the Western Desert. It is integrated into the national grid via four substations: three connected to the 220 kV network, and the fourth to the 500 kV network via a 220/500 kV step-up transformer [20].

A standard PV system is composed of photovoltaic modules, a DC/DC converter, a DC/AC inverter, and a transformer, as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2. PV system layout

Figure 2. PV system layout

In the DIgSILENT PowerFactory environment, the Benban photovoltaic installation is represented as a static PV generator [23, 24]. This generator can operate in one of three modes:

•    PQ mode, controlling active and reactive power independently

•    Voltage regulation mode, maintaining grid voltage within desired limits

•    Droop control mode, adjusting output according to frequency variations

For this research, the Benban park is configured to function in voltage regulation mode. According to the Egyptian grid code requirements for large-scale solar plants, the reactive power of the Benban system is constrained within a range of −0.33 p.u. to +0.33 p.u. when operating at its rated active power, as depicted in Figure 3.

Figure 3. P-Q capability curve for large-scale renewable energy plants [4, 26, 27] (Reprinted with permission from ref. [4]. Copyright 2021 IEEE).

Figure 3. P-Q capability curve for large-scale renewable energy plants [4, 26, 27] (Reprinted with permission from ref. [4]. Copyright 2021 IEEE).

Hydropower plants

Egypt hosts two historically significant hydropower facilities: the Aswan Dam and the High Dam. The Aswan Dam, which began operation in 1899, currently provides a total installed capacity of 0.55 GW. The High Dam, commissioned in 1960, consists of 12 generating units, each rated at 175 MW, resulting in a combined capacity of 2.1 GW.

Wind energy

The Red Sea coastal region of Egypt offers substantial wind energy potential. The country’s first large-scale wind installation, the Zaafarana Wind Farm, was commissioned in 2001 with a total capacity of 0.745 GW and is located approximately 120 km south of Suez.

Another key site along the Gulf of Suez is the Gabal Zeet region, which hosts extensive wind resources. The Gabal Zeet Wind Project has been developed in three stages [28]: Stage 1 established a 240 MW wind farm, Stage 2 added 220 MW, and Stage 3 contributed an additional 120 MW. In 2016, only the first stage (240 MW) was included in simulations of the Egyptian power system, but the current total capacity has been expanded to 580 MW.

For this study, all wind farms are modeled as Type 3 systems equipped with Doubly Fed Induction Generators (DFIG). Figure 4 illustrates a simplified schematic of a Type 3 wind turbine represented as a generator bus [29].

Figure 4. Type 3 wind turbine and associated wind farm.

Figure 4. Type 3 wind turbine and associated wind farm.

Optimization of the Egyptian Power Grid

Definition of the optimization problem

Among the six regions, Upper Egypt hosts three power stations that use sustainable energy technologies, offering the potential to supply the majority of its electricity demand from renewable sources for most hours of the day. This region is interconnected with both the Canal and Middle Egypt regions. Carbon dioxide emissions in Upper Egypt can be reduced by importing electricity from wind farms in the Canal region while decreasing reliance on generation from Middle Egypt. The optimization of the Egyptian power system can thus be formulated as follows:

Objective function (F): Maximize renewable energy penetration (𝐹1), minimize overall power losses (𝐹2), and reduce voltage deviations (𝐹3). The multi-objective function is constructed with equal weighting for 𝐹1, 𝐹2, and 𝐹3.

Objective Functions:

Maximizing the proportion of renewable energy

The goal is to increase the utilization of sustainable energy by minimizing the curtailed output from each renewable power plant, park, or farm.

(1)

Minimizing total power losses

The total active power loss, 𝑃𝐿𝑜𝑠𝑠, can be expressed as:

(2)

Where 𝑁𝐿 is the number of transmission lines or cables in the system, 𝐺𝑖𝑗 is the conductance of the line connecting bus i and j, 𝑉𝑖 and 𝑉𝑗 are the voltages at buses i and j, respectively, and θ𝑖𝑗 is the voltage phase angle difference between the two buses.

Minimizing voltage deviations

(3)

Decision Variables: Voltages at each bus, transformer tap settings, and the active/reactive power outputs of all generators.

Constraints:

•    Equality constraints representing load flow equations.

(4)

(5)

•    Inequality constraints reflecting operational limits.

•    Generation capacity limits for each power station.

(6)

(7)

•    Voltage magnitude bounds at each bus.

(8)

•    Maximum loading limits for cables and transmission lines.

(9)

•    Transformer tap changing limits.

(10)

•    Capacitor reactive power limits.

(11)

Where 𝑁𝐵 represents the total number of buses, 𝛿𝑖 is the voltage angle at bus i, 𝐵𝑖𝑗 is the susceptance between buses i and j, 𝑇𝑘 denotes the transformer tap range, 𝑄𝑐𝑖 is the reactive power of capacitor i, 𝑃𝐺𝑖 and 𝑄𝐺𝑖 are the active and reactive power outputs of generator i, and 𝑃𝐷𝑖 and 𝑄𝐷𝑖 correspond to the active and reactive power demands at bus i.

CVO algorithm design

Since December 2019, the world has faced the rapid spread of the respiratory virus COVID-19, which infected over 83,000,000 people globally in 2020, resulting in approximately 1,800,000 deaths and 60,000,000 recoveries [30]. Inspired by the efficiency of bio-inspired optimization techniques in various machine learning applications, researchers have introduced the COVID-19 Variants Optimization (CVO) as a novel metaheuristic algorithm. CVO offers several advantages over existing methods:

•    Its parameters are predefined with actual rates and probabilities, eliminating the need for additional tuning studies.

•    The search process can terminate after a set number of iterations without manual configuration.

•    The rapid spread mechanism mimics careful exploration of promising solution regions, while parallel draining ensures consistent coverage of the entire search space.

The flow of the CVO algorithm is illustrated in Figure 5 and follows the procedural steps outlined next.

Figure 5. Flowchart of the CVO algorithm.

Figure 5. Flowchart of the CVO algorithm.

 

Step 1: initialization (Patient Zero)

The process begins by generating the initial population, representing the first individual infected with COVID-19. If no prior optimal solution exists, the initial population is assigned randomly.

Step 2: disease propagation

Propagation of the “disease” occurs according to the following scenarios:

1. Case 1: Each individual has a probability of death (PDIE) based on COVID-19 mortality rates; deceased individuals cannot infect others.

2. Case 2: Surviving individuals can infect new ones according to the probability PSUPERSPREADER, which considers:

•    Ordinary spreaders: Infect others based on the normal spreading rate (RSpreading).

•    Super spreaders: Infect others at a higher rate (RSuperspreading).

3.       Case 3: Individuals (ordinary or super spreaders) may travel and explore new solutions in the search space. The probability of travel (PTravel) and the infection rate due to travel (RTravel) govern this behavior.

Step 3: population updating

Three populations are updated at each iteration:

•    Death population: Individuals who die are recorded and excluded from further iterations.

•    Recovered population: Individuals who recover are tracked and may be re-infected in future iterations with probability PReinfected. Properly isolated individuals may also join the recovered population with probability PIsolated.

•    Newly infected population: All newly infected individuals in the current iteration are recorded; duplicates are removed before proceeding to the next iteration.

Step 4: termination criteria

The process can end automatically when death and recovery rates stabilize, and the newly infected population no longer spreads the infection. In some iterations, the number of infected individuals may fluctuate due to large numbers of deaths or recoveries. Additionally, the process can stop after a predefined number of iterations (pandemic duration) or after a predefined period based on social distancing measures.

Parameter Settings:

PDIE = 0.05, PSUPERSPREADER = 0.1, PTravel = 0.1, PReinfected = 0.02, PIsolated = 0.8, Pandemic duration = 30, Social distance = 8 [21, 31].

To prevent premature convergence to local optima, optimal parameter values are chosen by adjusting population size, social distance, and pandemic duration within DIgSILENT. Multiple optimization runs are conducted to further reduce the risk of local minima.

CVO has been applied since its inception to problems such as transportation networks [32] and neural network training [31]. The algorithm is implemented in DIgSILENT using the DPL programming language and employed for optimal power flow (OPF) calculations.

Simulation Results

The simulation studies aim to evaluate the ability to maximize renewable energy penetration while simultaneously minimizing total power losses and voltage deviations. The analysis considers two representative days: one typical summer day and one typical winter day. Tables 1 and 2 summarize daily electricity demand, solar irradiance, and wind speed for the summer and winter cases, respectively, along with the corresponding renewable energy penetration levels in the Upper Egypt region.

Table 1. Summer daily load, solar radiation, and wind speed in Egypt.

Time (h)

Total load (MW)

Solar radiation (W/m2)

Wind speed (m/s)

0

29,184

0

5.5

1

28,799

0

5.1

2

27,904

0

4.6

3

27,396

0

4.0

4

26,728

0

4.2

5

25,949

0

4.3

6

25,208

14

4.8

7

25,329

63

4.4

8

26,086

172

4.3

9

28,170

395

4.1

10

29,147

653

4.3

11

29,512

849

4.5

12

30,250

979

4.8

13

30,476

1020

4.9

14

30,830

978

5.3

15

30,546

856

6.2

16

30,654

663

7.1

17

30,613

417

7.9

18

30,190

184

8.2

19

30,746

49

8.6

20

31,751

2

7.5

21

31,348

0

6.8

22

30,829

0

5.9

23

30,558

0

5.6

 

Table 2. Winter daily load, solar radiation, and wind speed in Egypt.

Time (h)

Total load (MW)

Solar radiation (W/m2)

Wind speed (m/s)

0

18,313

0

3.8

1

17,210

0

3.9

2

16,376

0

3.8

3

15,672

0

3.9

4

15,268

0

4.0

5

15,184

0

3.9

6

16,057

24

3.9

7

17,261

72

4.0

8

18,035

271

4.5

9

19,130

608

5.0

10

19,975

718

5.2

11

20,494

623

5.4

12

20,920

491

6.0

13

21,113

554

6.3

14

21,375

112

6.4

15

21,763

45

6.6

16

21,984

8

6.5

17

22,297

1

6.4

18

24,588

0

6.2

19

24,154

0

5.8

20

23,456

0

5.2

21

22,688

0

4.7

22

21,733

0

4.4

23

20,592

0

4.1

 

Case Study 1: summer-day operation of the egyptian power grid

The contribution of renewable energy within Upper Egypt and across the entire national grid is depicted in Figure 6, calculated following Eqs. 12 and 13. Total system losses, along with the voltage deviation index, are presented in Figure 7 [6], while Figure 8 details the individual penetration levels of PV, wind, and hydro sources, as defined by Eqs. 14, 15, and 16. The analysis evaluates three distinct approaches: (i) optimization via the CVO algorithm, (ii) implementation of TLBO, and (iii) operation without any optimization applied.

(12)

(13)

(14)

(15)

(16)

For clarity, 𝑃𝑃𝑉 corresponds to the electricity generated by the Benban PV station, 𝑃𝐻𝑦𝑑𝑟𝑜 represents output from the High Dam and Aswan Reservoir hydropower stations, 𝑃𝑊𝑖𝑛𝑑 denotes wind generation within the Canal region, and 𝑃𝑊𝑖𝑛𝑑_𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑑 refers to the portion of Canal-region wind power transmitted to Upper Egypt, assuming an operational 220 kV interconnection.

Figure 6. Renewable energy contribution in Upper Egypt and across the entire Egyptian grid during a summer day

Figure 6. Renewable energy contribution in Upper Egypt and across the entire Egyptian grid during a summer day

Figure 7. Overall power losses and voltage deviation index for a summer-day scenario

Figure 7. Overall power losses and voltage deviation index for a summer-day scenario

 

Figure 8. Penetration levels of PV, wind, and hydro in the Egyptian grid during a summer day

Figure 8. Penetration levels of PV, wind, and hydro in the Egyptian grid during a summer day

The simulation results indicate that implementing the CVO algorithm for optimal operation allows Upper Egypt to achieve a full renewable energy supply for more than half of the summer day. In contrast, TLBO achieves this for only 11 hours, and without optimization, a full renewable supply occurs for just 4 hours. Across the entire Egyptian grid, CVO maintains a renewable share of 15% or higher for 20 hours during the day, compared to 12 hours with TLBO and only 2 hours without optimization. Total system losses are reduced by over 10% when using CVO relative to TLBO, while the unoptimized system experiences 30% higher losses than CVO and 20% higher than TLBO. Additionally, CVO yields the lowest voltage deviation index compared to TLBO and the unoptimized scenario. Peak PV penetration reaches 12% with CVO versus 11% with TLBO, wind penetration reaches 7% versus 5%, and hydro penetration reaches 10% versus 8% under the existing energy mix.

Case Study 2: winter-day operation of the egyptian grid

Figure 9 presents the share of renewable energy in Upper Egypt and across the entire grid during a winter day, while Figure 10 shows total system losses and the voltage deviation index. Figure 11 illustrates the penetration levels of PV, wind, and hydro for scenarios with and without CVO and TLBO optimization applied.

Figure 9. Contribution of renewable energy in Upper Egypt and across the entire grid during a winter day.

Figure 9. Contribution of renewable energy in Upper Egypt and across the entire grid during a winter day.

 

Figure 10. Overall power losses and voltage deviation index for a winter-day scenario.

Figure 10. Overall power losses and voltage deviation index for a winter-day scenario.

Figure 11. PV, wind, and hydro penetration levels across the grid during a winter day.

Figure 11. PV, wind, and hydro penetration levels across the grid during a winter day.

The simulation results reveal that applying the CVO and TLBO optimization algorithms enables full renewable energy generation in Upper Egypt throughout the entire winter day. In contrast, without optimization, a full renewable supply is achieved for only 10 hours. Across all Egyptian regions, CVO maintains a renewable share of 20% or higher for 15 hours during the winter day, while TLBO reaches this threshold for only 6 hours, and the unoptimized system never attains 20% penetration. Total power losses are reduced by over 10% with CVO compared to TLBO, while the unoptimized system experiences 20% higher losses than CVO and 10% higher than TLBO. Furthermore, CVO achieves the lowest voltage deviation index across all scenarios on a winter day. Peak PV penetration reaches 17% using CVO versus 15% with TLBO; wind penetration reaches 10% in both methods, and hydro penetration also reaches 10% in both cases.

Figure 12 illustrates the convergence behavior of TLBO and CVO, showing that CVO attains the optimal fitness value in fewer iterations. Figures 13 and 14 depict CPU usage for TLBO and CVO across each hour of a summer and winter day, respectively, indicating that CVO requires, on average, 10% less computational time than TLBO in most hours for both seasons.

Figure 12. Convergence behavior of TLBO and CVO algorithms.

Figure 12. Convergence behavior of TLBO and CVO algorithms.

Figure 13. Hourly CPU time for TLBO and CVO during a summer-day operation.

Figure 13. Hourly CPU time for TLBO and CVO during a summer-day operation.

Figure 14. Hourly CPU time for TLBO and CVO during a winter-day operation

Figure 14. Hourly CPU time for TLBO and CVO during a winter-day operation

This study investigated the optimal operation of the Egyptian power system to maximize renewable energy penetration, minimize total power losses, and reduce voltage deviations. The optimization was carried out using both the CVO and TLBO algorithms within the DIgSILENT software environment and the simulated grid model. The results demonstrate that CVO outperforms TLBO in achieving all three objectives, as summarized in Table 3. Additionally, the convergence behavior of CVO is nearly linear, reflecting its faster response and quicker attainment of optimal solutions compared to TLBO.

Table 3. Error between CVO and TLBO in %.

Winter day

Renewable energy share

38%

Power losses

10%

Voltage deviation

14%

CPU time

11%

Summer day

Renewable energy share

40%

Power losses

20%

Voltage deviation

13%

CPU time

9%

The proposed CVO approach can be implemented in the Egyptian power grid by calculating optimal generation outputs for each power plant, with the national control center directing plants to adjust their production accordingly. Future work will focus on strategies to enhance renewable energy penetration throughout the year to meet the planned share of renewables in the Egyptian grid, as well as studying the effects of renewable generation uncertainties [33, 34] on the optimization outcomes.

Conclusion

This study introduced a novel CVO-based method to maximize the contribution of sustainable energy sources in the Egyptian power system while minimizing total line losses and voltage deviations. Compared to TLBO and the unoptimized case, the CVO optimization enables more efficient utilization of available renewable energy resources. During the simulated summer day, CVO achieved full renewable generation in Upper Egypt for 13 hours, compared to 11 hours with TLBO and only 4 hours without optimization. On a representative winter day, both CVO and TLBO enabled 100% renewable supply in Upper Egypt for 24 hours, whereas the system without optimization achieved this for only 10 hours. Across the full grid, CVO maintained renewable penetration above 20% for 15 hours during winter, versus 6 hours with TLBO; during summer, renewable share exceeded 15% for 20 hours with CVO compared to 12 hours with TLBO. The CVO method also reduced total power losses by over 10% relative to TLBO and 20–30% compared to the unoptimized system during summer and winter days. Furthermore, the multi-objective CVO-based power flow yielded the lowest voltage deviations across all scenarios. PV penetration reached up to 17% in winter and 12% in summer under CVO. The algorithm demonstrated faster convergence with fewer iterations and lower CPU time than TLBO, confirming its computational efficiency.

Acknowledgements

None

Conflict of interest

None

Financial support

None

Ethics statement

None

References

UN Sustainable Development Goals [Internet]. [cited 2021 Nov 2]. Available from: https://sdgs.un.org/goals
Rogelj J, Den Elzen M, Höhne N, Fransen T, Fekete H, Winkler H, et al. Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C. Nature. 2016;534:631–9.
Fayek HH. 5G Poor and Rich Novel Control Scheme Based Load Frequency Regulation of a Two-Area System with 100% Renewables in Africa. Fractal Fract. 2020;5(1):2.
Fayek HH, Abdalla OH. Maximization of Renewable Power Generation for Optimal Operation of the Egyptian Grid. In: Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 29th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE). Delft, Netherlands; 2020 Jun 17–19. p. 1033–8.
International Trade Administration [Internet]. Egypt Renewable Energy [cited 2021 Nov 2]. Available from: https://www.trade.gov/knowledge-product/egypt-renewable-energy
Abdalla HO, Fayek HH, Ghany AMA. Secondary Voltage Control Application in a Smart Grid with 100% Renewables. Inventions. 2020;5(3):37.
Agora. Integrating Renewables into the Japanese Power Grid by 2030 [Internet]. Report. Tokyo: Japan’s Renewable Energy Institute; 2018 [cited 2021 Nov 2]. Available from: https://www.renewable-ei.org/pdfdownload/activities/REI_Agora_Japan_grid_study_FullReport_EN_WEB.pdf
Kalloe N, Bos J, Torres JR, van der Meijden M, Palensky P. A Fundamental Study on the Transient Stability of Power Systems with High Shares of Solar PV Plants. Electricity. 2020;1(1):62–86.
Papaefthymiou G, Dragoon K. Towards 100% renewable energy systems: Uncapping power system flexibility. Energy Policy. 2016;92:69–82.
Cosic B, Krajacic G, Duic N. A 100% renewable energy system in the year 2050: The case of Macedonia. Energy. 2012;48(1):80–7.
Mikkola J, Lund P. Modeling flexibility and optimal use of existing power plants with large-scale variable renewable power schemes. Energy. 2016;112:364–75.
International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). Innovative Solutions for 100% Renewable Power in Sweden [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Nov 8]. Available from: https://www.irena.org/publications/2020/Jan/Innovative-solutions-for-100-percent-renewable-power-in-Sweden
Doepfert M, Castro R. Techno-economic optimization of a 100% renewable energy system in 2050 for countries with high shares of hydropower: The case of Portugal. Renew Energy. 2021;165:491–503.
de Simón-Martín M, de la Puente-Gil Á, Borge-Diez D, Ciria-Garcés T, González-Martínez A. Wind energy planning for a sustainable transition to a decarbonized generation scenario based on the opportunity cost of the wind energy: Spanish Iberian Peninsula as case study. Energy Procedia. 2019;157:1144–63.
el Río P, Silvosa AC, Gómez GI. Policies and design elements for the repowering of wind farms: A qualitative analysis of different options. Energy Policy. 2011;39(4):1897–908.
Wu J, Guo S, Huang H, Liu W, Xiang Y. Information and Communications Technologies for Sustainable Development Goals: State-of-the-Art, Needs and Perspectives. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor. 2018;20(3):2389–406.
Nikolova S, Causevski A, Al-Salaymeh A. Optimal operation of conventional power plants in power system with integrated renewable energy sources. Energy Convers Manag. 2013;65:697–703.
Abdalla OH, Fayek HH, Abdel Ghany AG. Secondary and Tertiary Voltage Control of a Multi-Region Power System. Electricity. 2020;1(1):37–59.
Ghoshal SP. Optimizations of PID gains by particle swarm optimizations in fuzzy based automatic generation control. Electr Power Syst Res. 2004;72(3):203–12.
Rao RV, Savsani VJ, Vakharia DP. Teaching-Learning Based Optimization: A Novel Optimization Method for Continuous Non-Linear Large Scale Problems. Inf Sci. 2012;183(1):1–15.
Martínez-Álvarez F, Asencio-Cortés G, Torres JF, Gutiérrez-Avilés D, Melgar-García L, Pérez-Chacón R, et al. Coronavirus Optimization Algorithm: A bioinspired metaheuristic based on the COVID-19 propagation model. Big Data. 2020;8(4):308–22.
Abdalla OH, Ghany AMA, Fayek HH. Development of a digital model of the Egyptian power grid for steady-state and transient studies. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEENG-11). Cairo, Egypt; 2018 Apr 3–5. Paper No 83-EPS.
Abdalla OH, Fayek HH, Ghany AA. Steady-State and Transient Performances of the Egyptian Grid with Benban Photovoltaic Park. In: Proceedings of the Cigre Egypt 2019 Conference, The Future of Electricity Grids—Challenges and Opportunities. Cairo, Egypt; 2019 Mar 6–8. Paper No. 205.
Shaltout MM, Hassan AH, Fathy AM. Total suspended particles and solar radiation over Cairo and Aswan. Renew Energy. 2001;23(3–4):605–19.
New and Renewable Energy Authority (NREA)—EcoConServ Environmental Solutions. Benban 1.8 GW PV Solar Park, Egypt Strategic Environmental & Social Assessment: Final Report [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2021 Nov 9]. p. 1–210. Available from: http://www.eib.org/attachments/registers/65771943.pdf
EgyptEra. Solar Energy Grid Connection Code [Internet]. Cairo: Egyptian Electric Utility and Consumer Protection Regulatory Authority; 2021 [cited 2021 Nov 10]. Available from: http://www.egyptera.org
Abdalla OH. Technical Requirements for Connecting Medium and Large Solar Power Plants to Electricity Networks in Egypt. J Egypt Soc Eng. 2018;57:25–36.
Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) [Internet]. [cited 2021 Nov 1]. Available from: https://www3.opic.gov/Environment/EIA/lekelaboo/Main_ESIA.pdf
PowerFactory DIgSILENT GmbH [Internet]. [cited 2021 Nov 2]. Available from: http://www.digsilent.de
World Meter [Internet]. [cited 2021 Feb 10]. Available from: https://www.worldometers.info/
Saffari A, Khishe M. Classification of Marine Mammals Using Trained Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network with Whale Algorithm Developed with Fuzzy System [Internet]. Research Square; 2020 [cited 2021 Dec 31]. Available from: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-122787/v1
LMajdoubi O, Abdoun F, Abdoun O. A New Optimized Approach to Resolve a Combinatorial Problem: CoronaVirus Optimization Algorithm and Self-organizing Maps. In: Motahhir S, Bossoufi B, editors. Digital Technologies and Applications. ICDTA 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Vol. 211. Cham: Springer; 2021.
Li Y, Han M, Yang Z, Li G. Coordinating Flexible Demand Reponse and Renewable Uncertainties for Scheduling of Community Integrated Energy Systems with an Electric Vehicle Charging Station: A Bi-Level Approach. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy. 2021;12(4):2321–31.
Li Y, Yang Z, Li G, Zhao D, Tian W. Optimal Scheduling of an Isolated Microgrid with Battery Storage Considering Load and Renewable Generation Uncertainties. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2019;66(2):1565–75.

Author information

Paolo Ricci, Marco De Luca, Giulia Ferraro & Antonio Russo contributed to this work.

Authors and affiliations

Department of Smart Grid Technologies, Faculty of Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
Paolo Ricci, Marco De Luca & Antonio Russo

Department of Energy Data Analytics, Faculty of Engineering, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Giulia Ferraro

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Ricci

Rights and permissions

Open Access The author(s) retain copyright. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. It may be shared and adapted for non-commercial purposes with appropriate attribution, an indication of changes, and distribution of adaptations under the same license. Third-party material may be subject to separate terms identified in its credit line. View the license at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.

About this article

Cite this article

Vancouver
Ricci P, De Luca M, Ferraro G, Russo A. Maximizing Renewable Energy Integration in the Egyptian Power Grid Using the Coronavirus Optimization Algorithm. J Smart Grids Energy Anal Optim. 2025;4:118.
APA
Ricci, P., De Luca, M., Ferraro, G., & Russo, A. (2025). Maximizing Renewable Energy Integration in the Egyptian Power Grid Using the Coronavirus Optimization Algorithm. Journal of Smart Grids, Energy Analytics and Optimization, 4, 118.
Received
11 March 2025
Revised
09 May 2025
Accepted
18 June 2025
Published
20 September 2025
Version of record
20 September 2025

Share this article

Easily share this article with others using the link below:

Maximizing Renewable Energy Integration in the Egyptian Power Grid Using the Coronavirus Optimization Algorithm
Scan to access
this article

Ready to submit?
Start a new submission or continue a submission in progress:
Submission Portal Author Guidelines

Follow this journal
Get notified of new updates and articles.